ArticleMilitary medicine2026
Estimating Blood Volume Loss With Wireless, Wearable Ultrasound: A Pilot Investigation.
Article in Military medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDetecting and estimating blood volume loss are important for the diagnosis and management of life-threatening hemorrhage. There is a direct relationship between percent blood volume loss (BVL%) and falling in stroke volume (SV); furthermore, there is a direct relationship between diminishing SV and the corrected flow time of the carotid artery (ccFT). Therefore, we hypothesized that change in ccFT (ccFTΔ) would directly relate with BVL% in a phlebotomy paradigm. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective, convenience sample of healthy volunteers was studied. Volunteers underwent blood donation protocol in a physiology lab. A wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound system monitored ccFT during blood donation. Traditional vital signs were also measured throughout. The relationship between traditional vital signs as well as ccFTΔ were compared to BVL% using 2 mixed linear regression models.
resultsData from 20 subjects and blood donations comprising 46,123 cardiac cycles are included. On average 413.5 ± 39 mL of blood were drawn representing 8.6 ± 1.6% BVL%. There was a significant and strong linear relationship between BVL% and ccFTΔ during blood draw with the regression slope demonstrating that for every 1 ms reduction in ccFT there was a 0.4% reduction in blood volume.
conclusionsIn healthy subjects and when blood loss is the sole mechanism for falling SV, we estimate that for every 1 ms reduction in ccFT, there is an approximate 0.4 BVL%. Validation of these results in patients with traumatic hemorrhage is underway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.