Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42560180›Full record

ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2026

Veterinarian attitudes towards immunocontraceptive use in cats.

E Vartola, S Wills, E Cottingham, C D Marth, N Krekeler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E VartolaMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
S WillsMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
E CottinghamMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
C D MarthMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
N KrekelerMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6848-0651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe continuously expanding global cat population poses concerns to public health, native ecosystems and individual animal welfare. These concerns have led to additional management strategies to reduce unowned cat numbers, including the development of feline immunocontraceptives. Use of these contraceptives could also provide pet owners with alternatives to surgical sterilisation. However, the implementation of immunocontraceptives into feline medicine requires the support of the veterinary community.

aimsThe aim of this research was to evaluate the current global attitudes and interests held by veterinarians towards immunocontraceptive use in cats to guide future research in the field.

methodsA globally distributed survey was conducted assessing veterinarians' attitudes and practices regarding surgical sterilisation and the use of immunocontraceptives in feline populations as an alternative to surgical sterilisation.

resultsThe survey was completed by 122 veterinarians across 11 countries. The majority, 59% of respondents, felt unfamiliar with immunocontraceptives. The main concerns included longevity of reproductive contraception (86% agreed), product efficacy (78% agreed) and cost (73% agreed). Overall, 61% of respondents reported they were more likely than unlikely to implement the use of feline immunocontraceptives should they become available in the future.

conclusionThese results indicate that the majority of responding veterinarians were interested in utilising feline immunocontraceptives should they become available. This survey highlights the need for further high-quality research and education to improve practitioner knowledge regarding immunocontraceptive action, efficacy and safety in cats and to increase the likelihood of veterinarians utilising these therapies should they become licensed and available in the future.

Indexed as

Contraception, ImmunologicVeterinariansAnimalsCatsFemaleHumansMaleSterilization, ReproductiveSurveys and Questionnairesfeline immunocontraceptivesfeline population controlfeline sterilisationsurgical sterilisation alternatives

Identifiers

PMID42560180
PMCPMC13631546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.