Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42560176›Full record

SynthesisFamily practice2026

Factors influencing mutual trust in interprofessional partnerships within primary care settings: a systematic review.

Amary Mey, Miaoyin Guo, Hannah Warriner, Kylie Vuong

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Family practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amary MeySchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Southport, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5339-5101
Miaoyin GuoSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.
Hannah WarrinerSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.
Kylie VuongSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2671-9473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrust between healthcare providers is important in facilitating collaborative practices, especially in primary care, where disciplines collaborate across communities to deliver patient-centred care.

objectiveTo identify the facilitators and barriers that influence trust in interprofessional partnerships within primary care settings.

methodsWe searched PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, and CINAHL using key words to identify articles published up to 16 August 2023. Facilitators and barriers to trust were mapped onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Quality assessment utilized the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

resultsFrom 5750 screened articles, 11 studies were included. Sixteen facilitators and seven barriers were identified. Facilitators included co-location, familiarity, competence, professional identities, and effective communication. Barriers included perceived conflicts of interest, lack of familiarity, and transgressions of professional boundaries. Trust was often unbalanced, with a perception among non-medical healthcare professionals that they need to earn trust from medical healthcare professionals.

conclusionsFormation and nurturing of interprofessional trust is the foundation for building strong partnerships between healthcare professionals that promote collaborative practice in primary care. Future research should include non-English and grey literature and focus on the unequal trust dynamics.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorHealth PersonnelInterprofessional RelationsPrimary Health CareTrustCommunicationHumansPatient-Centered Careinterprofessional collaborationinterprofessional relationshipmutual trustprimary caretrust

Identifiers

PMID42560176
PMCPMC13445621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.