ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
Directional Association Between Perilesional Fundus Autofluorescence and Geographic Atrophy Border Expansion.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the directional association between perilesional fundus autofluorescence (FAF) intensity and geographic atrophy (GA) border expansion. Methods: This study included 102 untreated fellow eyes from the MAHALO clinical trial with FAF images at baseline and 6 months. FAF intensity was normalized within each eye and analyzed within two perilesional zones (0-250 µm and 0-500 µm). The highest and lowest 25% of normalized intensity were defined as hyperautofluorescence (hyperAF) and hypoautofluorescence (hypoAF), respectively. A relative density metric (sector value minus eye-level mean) was calculated for each clock-hour sector. GA border expansion was quantified using Euclidean distance mapping. Associations between FAF density and sector-wise GA expansion were assessed using linear mixed-effects models. Sensitivity analyses using 20% and 30% thresholds and subgroup analysis of unifocal lesions were performed. Results: Across all conditions, higher hyperAF density was not associated with greater extent of GA border expansion and showed consistently negative regression slopes (all P < 0.001). In contrast, higher hypoAF density was significantly associated with greater GA expansion, with uniformly positive regression slopes across all ring sizes and thresholds (all P < 0.001). These findings were consistent in eyes with unifocal lesions and across sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: GA expansion is not preferentially directed toward regions of higher hyperAF but rather, is associated with hypoAF-dominant areas. These findings suggest that GA progression may be related to spatial changes in perilesional autofluorescence (AF) patterns, although the underlying biological mechanisms require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.