Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42559746›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

How Do We Achieve Impactful Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in Statistical Methodology Research? A Qualitative Research Protocol.

Julie Roberts, Samina Begum, Beatriz Goulao, Nicola Mackintosh, Michelle O'Reilly, Christopher Newby, Laura J Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julie RobertsDivision of Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6099-9600
Samina BegumPublic Contributor and Co-Author, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Beatriz GoulaoSchool of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1490-7183
Nicola MackintoshDivision of Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0137-6432
Michelle O'ReillySchool of Criminology, Sociology & Social Policy, School of Psychology & Vision Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1978-6405
Christopher NewbyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Laura J GrayDivision of Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9284-9321

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/24/130031Medical Research Council APP41101National Institute for Health and Care Research APP41101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is vital for good-quality health research. However, PPIE is more commonly practised in some types of research than others. Statistical methodology research aims to improve the way we design studies and analyse data. It can be particularly challenging to involve members of the public and patients in this type of research because the work can be technical and difficult to explain. Consequently, PPIE work typically requires considerable time and resources. Our previous research suggests that most statistical methodologists do not feel confident in carrying out PPIE for statistical methodology research and would benefit from access to new guidance and training.

methodsThis qualitative, ethnographic study will combine observations and interviews to generate new insights into what works well, and what the challenges are, when involving the public in statistical methodology research. Data will be analysed using the template approach and presented in composite case studies, generating an interactive guidance document for researchers and PPIE groups to support the practice of impactful PPIE in statistical methodology research. DISSEMINATION: We will hold a virtual launch event for the co-produced guidance and case studies. These will be made freely available on a dedicated website and Learning for Involvement, and highlighted via social media. The work will be presented at key conferences and published in open-access peer-reviewed journals. Findings will also be shared in educational resources to influence the next generation of researchers. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The study design has been informed by the perspectives of public co-applicants on the grant. The research team will work alongside a public advisory group (PAG) consisting of six public contributors with extensive PPIE experience. The PAG will be chaired by Begum, a public co-applicant. We will recruit three more public contributors to take part in online workshops to develop the main output of the study.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationPatient ParticipationResearch DesignAnthropology, CulturalHumansQualitative Researchcomposite case studiesco‐productionguidancepatient and public involvement and engagementprotocolqualitative researchstatistical methodology

Identifiers

PMID42559746
PMCPMC13445566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.