ArticleChildren and youth services review2026
Does greater purchasing power of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program improve children's development?
Article in Children and youth services review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does greater purchasing power of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program improve children's development?Children and youth services review · 2026Article
- Do Larger Earned Income Tax Credit and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefits Create Complementary Effects on Child Development?Population research and policy review · 2026Article
- Settlement Duration Matters: Deportation Threat and Safety Net Participation Among Mixed-Status Families.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2025Article
- Investigating the Poverty-Reducing Effects of SNAP on Non-nutritional Family Outcomes: A Scoping Review.Maternal and child health journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) plays an important role in reducing poverty. Despite the strong link between poverty and child development, particularly in early childhood, there is limited evidence on the effect of SNAP on the health and development of children, who comprise the largest group of SNAP recipients. The lack of research on this topic is partly due to a lack of variation in SNAP benefit policies across states. This study addresses this research gap by examining associations between cumulative SNAP purchasing power and cognitive, socioemotional, and health development among children in early childhood (age 4-6), drawing on data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort. The study uses two empirical strategies, a two-way (child and year) fixed effects model and a random effects model, to leverage the variation in SNAP purchasing power across the market group and year in which a child is observed. Findings suggest cumulative benefits of SNAP purchasing power for children's early reading skills among families who receive SNAP. Although not conclusive, this association seems to be partly driven by increases in parental reading time with the child. While greater SNAP purchasing power is positively associated with early math skills, approaches to learning skills, and general health status, these estimates are not robust and should be interpreted with caution. This paper informs policymakers that increasing SNAP benefit levels to account for local prices can enhance the effectiveness of SNAP in improving children's early cognitive development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.