ArticleFACE (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2026
Age-Related Changes in Perceived Nasal Resonance of Young Children With Repaired Cleft Palate: A Paired-Comparison Study.
Article in FACE (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective was to determine age-related changes in perceived nasal resonance of young children with repaired cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP ± L). A secondary objective was to explore associated changes in vowel segment duration, speaking rate, and fundamental frequency (F0) of the children. Design: Prospective, longitudinal observational. Setting and Participants: Twenty children with non-syndromic CP ± L followed at 3 facilities. Materials and Methods: All participants were audio recorded repeating identical speech samples at 3 time points corresponding to mean ages of 6, 7, and 8 years. Sixty audio files were created with counterbalanced pairs of recordings from the 3 time points. Five blinded speech-language pathologists judged which sample of a pair sounded more nasal. Main Outcome Measures: Paired-comparison judgments of nasality at each age; vowel duration, speaking rate, and F0 at each age derived from acoustic analysis. Results: Speech samples from the youngest age were judged as more nasal more often than samples from the older ages ( Conclusions: Children with repaired CP ± L are perceived to be more nasal at younger ages during production of phonetically identical speech samples. Clinicians need to be cognizant of age-related changes in other aspects of speech production that may influence judgments of nasal resonance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.