Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42559642›Full record

ArticleHawai'i journal of health & social welfare2026

Impact of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer Aided Detection System (CADe) on Colonoscopies Performed in Hawai'i.

Ankur Jain, Aadi Jain, Diya Jain, Shilpa Jain, Ian Pagano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ankur JainPunahou School.
Aadi JainPunahou School.
Diya JainPunahou School.
Shilpa JainPunahou School.
Ian PaganoUniversity of Hawai'i Cancer Center.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demand for colonoscopies has increased over the last few years due to an aging population combined with a post COVID-19 backlog as well as an ongoing rise in younger patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Quality indicators ensure that high quality colonoscopies are being performed by endoscopists, thus decreasing the risk of post-colonoscopy CRC arising from lesions missed on the index exam. One common outcome measure is known as the adenoma detection rate (ADR), which is the likelihood that an endoscopist will detect a pre-cancerous polyp during colonoscopy. The Artificial Intelligence (AI) program known as computer-aided detection system (CADe) was designed to improve the ADR of endoscopists by helping them identify colon polyps. Previous studies have evaluated the clinical outcomes of CADe but none were conducted in Hawai'i. This study was designed to determine the impact of GI Genius (Medtronic), the first CADe introduced in Hawai'i. Data was collected on aggregate ADR for both male and female patients before and after implementation of GI Genius in several ambulatory surgery centers in Hawai'i and then a cost-estimate analysis was performed. The GI Genius software program resulted in a statistically significant increase in ADR for both male and female patients. Furthermore, the addition of this program was found to be cost-effective when compared with standard colonoscopy alone due to an anticipated decrease in CRC related health care costs. CADe is a promising new tool for endoscopists, but further studies are needed to determine the long-term benefits on CRC incidence and mortality.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedAdenomaAgedFemaleHawaiiHumansMaleMiddle Agedadenoma detection rateartificial intelligencecolon polypscolorectal cancercomputer aided detection system

Identifiers

PMID42559642
PMCPMC13441498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.