Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42559598›Full record

ArticleThin solid films2025

Ultra-thin inorganic oxide and nitride films as an alternative blocking layer for electrochemical sensors.

Adam McHenry, Grant Jolly, Thomas Young, Michael Brothers, Victoria Coyle, Steve Kim, Jason Heikenfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thin solid films, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adam McHenryUniversity of Cincinnati, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9241-8591
Grant JollyUniversity of Cincinnati, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA.
Thomas YoungUniversity of Cincinnati, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9311-1145
Michael BrothersAeroVironment Inc., 4401 Dayton-Xenia Road, Dayton, OH, 45432, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8239-2399
Victoria Coyle711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 45433, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-4365-0180
Steve Kim711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 45433, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9519-077X
Jason HeikenfeldUniversity of Cincinnati, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA.

Funding

Breakthrough Blocking-Layer Stability for Broader Clinical Utility of Continuous Aptamer BiosensorsR21EB033874 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEIKENFELD, JASON · 2022 to 2024
$634k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB033874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The desire to translate biosensors for real time molecular monitoring has intensified due to the commercial success of 2-week continuous glucose monitors. However, a common limitation for emerging biosensors is that their lifetimes are often too short for commercially expected benchmarks of at least 3-day and ideally 2-week operation. Electrochemical sensors remain the preferred format of biochemical sensing thanks to their low cost, size, weight, and power requirements for mobile deployment. When exposed to biological fluid, all electrochemical sensors require a blocking layer to protect the electrode surface from fouling and redox interferents. Traditional blocking layer approaches rely on self-assembled monolayers which are often fragile to biological interferents like proteins and require specific electrode materials to improve their stability. Presented here is an evaluation of ultra-thin inorganic oxide and nitride films as an alternative to self-assembled monolayer blocking layers. Specifically, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, and aluminum oxide films were deposited by electron beam evaporation or atomic layer deposition at thicknesses of several nanometers to mimic the electrical capacitance of a conventional monolayer blocking layer. These oxide films were characterized over 7-days and demonstrated to provide poor protection against interfering redox currents from dissolved ferricyanide (150 - 300 μA/cm2) and oxygen reduction interference (30 - 60 μA/cm2). The oxide films were then used as a blocking layer in an electrochemical aptamer sensor using the previously published aptamer for phenylalanine. The phenylalanine sensor showed a binding affinity stronger than found in literature, but a reduced signal gain (~ 20 % change in methylene blue redox current compared to the expected 50 % previously published on gold). It is speculated and supported by literature that these oxide and nitride films gradually dissolve over periods of days in an aqueous environment. Results further show that if lower quality oxide or nitride films are used, they may be more stable, but at the cost of initially higher in currents. While oxide and nitride films fail to improve upon the performance of thiol-blocking layers on gold electrodes, they may provide utility in some applications by allowing for alternate electrode materials and surfaces to be used instead of traditional self-assembled monolayers on gold electrodes.

Indexed as

AptamerBiosensorBlocking layerDielectricElectrochemical sensor

Identifiers

PMID42559598
PMCPMC13441234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.