Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42559582›Full record

ArticleJournal of education & teaching in emergency medicine2026

Rapidly Progressive Painless Acute Aortic Dissection: A Case Report.

Justin Yang, Tyler Rigdon, Kristin Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin YangUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange, CA.
Tyler RigdonUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange, CA.
Kristin LewisUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) typically presents with sudden, severe chest or back pain. This case highlights an atypical painless presentation that was rapidly progressive and lethal. A 55-year-old woman presented with generalized weakness, agitation, and shortness of breath, but without pain. Initial point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was reassuring, but persistent agitation and emerging abdominal tenderness prompted reexamination and repeat POCUS, which revealed evidence of aortic dissection. Computed tomography angiogram (CTA) confirmed the diagnosis of a Stanford Type A dissection. Despite aggressive resuscitative efforts, the patient's condition deteriorated rapidly. This case emphasizes the importance of observant reassessment and repeating POCUS in atypical presentations of AAD because subtle clinical changes can reveal life-threatening conditions such as aortic dissection. Topics: Acute aortic dissection, abdominal aortic dissection, painless aortic dissection, atypical presentation, point-of-care ultrasound reassessment, diagnostic ultrasound.

Identifiers

PMID42559582
PMCPMC13441228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.