ArticleUrology annals
Assessment of factors associated with delayed diagnosis of cryptorchidism and orchidopexy.
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Undescended testis (UDT) is a congenital anomaly. Early orchidopexy preserves fertility and reduces the risk of malignancy. However, delays in diagnosis and surgeries remain common in Saudi Arabia. Objectives: Our study aims to determine the hospital-based proportion of UDT at our facility and factors associated with delayed orchidopexy in patients with a diagnosis or suspicion of UDT. This hospital-based study does not estimate population-level incidence or prevalence. Methodology: This study included children (0-14 years) with cryptorchidism (2018-2023). SPSS v25 analyzed data from the hospital's database, with descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, Results: Multivariate analysis identified that referrals from pediatric physicians had an odds ratio (OR) of 2.512 ( Conclusion: In our center, orchidopexy timing is significantly delayed, and the hospital-based proportion of UDT represents a substantial clinical burden. In our center, delays are associated with unstructured referral pathways and inadequate neonatal screening. Standardizing referrals and implementing structured neonatal screening are crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.