Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42559573›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Challenges in Pediatric Foregut Replacements: An 11-Year Single-Center Experience.

Susana Fortich, Jana E DeJesus, Esther Ewing, Geetha Radhakrishnan, Ravi Radhakrishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susana FortichDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA.
Jana E DeJesusDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA.
Esther EwingDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA.
Geetha RadhakrishnanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA.
Ravi RadhakrishnanDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Foregut replacements are performed in the pediatric population for esophageal atresia, long-segment strictures resistant to repeated dilations, caustic injuries, and malignancy. The need for foregut replacements has declined due to advances in the management of esophageal atresia and GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease), as well as protective devices on caustic chemical containers. However, given the technical challenges of these procedures, pediatric and general surgeons should be prepared in case a foregut replacement is required. This case series describes 10 foregut replacements performed between 2013 and 2024. Methods Case logs of a pediatric surgeon at an academic medical center were reviewed between December 2013 and December 2024. Cases involving "esophagectomy", "esophageal replacement", "ileocolonic interposition", and "gastric pull-up" were included. Patient charts and operative reports were reviewed. Results A total of 10 pediatric patients (aged eight months to 23 years) underwent foregut replacement. Most patients were female (n = 6, 60%) and Hispanic (n = 8, 80%). Esophageal atresia and caustic injury were the leading indications for surgery. Ileocolonic conduits were the most commonly used reconstruction method (n = 6, 60%). Early complications included anastomotic leaks (n = 5, 50%), infections (n = 3, 30%), and dumping syndrome (n = 1, 10%). Late complications included dysphagia (n = 7, 70%), stricture formation (n = 5, 50%), and GERD (n = 4, 40%). Conclusion Though infrequently performed, foregut replacements in the pediatric population are still required in certain pathologic cases. Our series examined 10 patients who underwent replacement over 11 years. Ileocolonic conduits were the most frequently performed reconstruction, and late complications were more common. Understanding the patient's clinical history and knowledge of conduit and route options are important for proper management.

Indexed as

colonic interpositionesophagectomy in childrenforegut reconstructiongastric interpositionpediatric esophageal replacement

Identifiers

PMID42559573
PMCPMC13441258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.