Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42559557›Full record

ArticleJournal of education & teaching in emergency medicine2026

Car Accident and Respiratory Distress: A Trauma-Based Pneumothorax Simulation Case for Medical Students.

Brandon Garten, Bradley Golden, A J Kleinheksel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brandon GartenMedical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA.
Bradley GoldenMedical College of Georgia, Department of Emergency Medicine, Augusta, GA.
A J KleinhekselMedical College of Georgia, Department of Medicine, Augusta, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Audience: This simulation is intended for second-year medical students who are in the pre-clinical phase of their medical school curriculum. This case is delivered as part of a longitudinal simulation-based curriculum that aligns with concurrent didactic instruction in the cardiopulmonary systems course. Introduction: Pneumothorax is a potentially life-threatening condition that requires urgent attention and intervention, particularly in the setting of trauma.1 Traumatic pneumothorax has been reported in up to one-third of patients presenting with blunt chest wall injury.2 If left unrecognized or inadequately treated, this may progress to a life-threatening tension pneumothorax, resulting in severe respiratory compromise and obstructive shock with hemodynamic instability. Early familiarity with structured trauma assessment and recognition of time-sensitive cardiopulmonary deterioration represents a foundational skill for learners entering clinical training.This case emphasizes critical actions central to emergency medicine practice, including high-flow oxygen delivery and the use of ultrasound to guide timely procedural intervention. It is also designed to introduce medical students to fundamental principles of trauma assessment and management, which are often not directly assessed in pre-clerkship curricula.3 Prior studies have demonstrated that early exposure to simulation-based trauma training improves learner confidence and clinical preparedness,4,5 supporting the use of this structured trauma scenario. Educational Objectives: By the end of this simulation, learners will be able to: 1) obtain a focused history in the setting of recent motor vehicle accident and respiratory difficulty, 2) identify abnormal respiratory findings consistent with pneumothorax on physical exam, 3) interpret chest x-ray and point-of-care ultrasound to identify the progression of a life-threatening tension pneumothorax,4) assess for potential internal bleeding and hypovolemic shock by integrating imaging findings, vital signs, mental status, and additional components of physical examination, 5) interpret imaging and clinical findings to guide appropriate management decisions, including need for urgent procedural intervention and escalation of care, and 6) deliver a concise oral presentation to an attending physician, including key findings and management plan. Educational Methods: This case is conducted using a high-fidelity simulation environment that includes a standardized nurse, vital sign monitoring, a mannequin, and video display for diagnostic imaging (chest x-ray and point-of-care ultrasound findings). The simulation case is structured around the ABCDE (airway, breathing, circulation, disability, exposure) approach to trauma assessment, encouraging learners to prioritize stabilization during an evolving clinical presentation.6 Through this scenario, learners are guided toward integrating history-taking, physical examination findings, and point-of-care diagnostics to identify and initiate management of a traumatic pneumothorax. The case also highlights core elements of acute care management including high-flow oxygen delivery, use of ultrasound, and timely coordination of procedural intervention.This simulation was developed using the principle of instructional scaffolding, in which learners progress through a structured pathway toward key clinical objectives.7 For this case, scaffolding is operationalized through facilitator cues, prompts from confederate actors, and dynamic changes in patient status (vital signs and mannequin responses) based on learner interventions. This approach was chosen because it allows learners to make independent clinical decisions within a guided framework and enhances reproducibility of the case. Research Methods: This simulation was piloted with a group of medical students participating in a simulation-based elective curriculum. Learner performance was assessed using a structured critical actions checklist developed by the authors based on relevant literature in simulation-based assessment8 and refined by an emergency medicine physician and a simulation education specialist. The checklist was designed to capture completion of key team-based clinical actions and to facilitate targeted feedback during debriefing, consistent with established best practices in simulation-based education.8The educational efficacy of the case was evaluated through structured debriefing, facilitator observation, and post-session learner feedback. Learner comments and facilitator observations were used to refine the simulation script, standardize nurse prompts, and pace the case. Results: The learner group involved in the case pilot consisted of four pre-clerkship medical students (n=4). The learner group independently completed five of seven predefined key action items, including obtaining a focused history, performing a complete physical exam, ordering point-of-care diagnostic imaging, interpreting chest radiograph findings consistent with tension pneumothorax, and delivering a concise presentation to the attending physician. Learners required prompting from confederates to escalate oxygen delivery and recognize the need for needle decompression.Learners rated the simulation highly for clinical relevance, realism, and educational value (median of 5 on 5-point Likert scale, range 4-5). Three of four learners (75%) reported increased confidence in approaching similar scenarios and all learners (100%) reported improved understanding of FAST exam interpretation, primary trauma survey, and pneumothorax management. Discussion: This case successfully integrates clinical reasoning and team communication within a high-acuity simulation. This represents a novel addition to the medical school's simulation curriculum because it is the first scenario in the pre-clerkship program to focus on the structured primary survey and acute management of a trauma patient. Learners benefitted from the scaffolded approach to airway assessment, application of point-of-care diagnostics, and emphasis on collaborative decision-making in a high-acuity setting. Topics: Pneumothorax, trauma, ultrasound, FAST exam, respiratory distress, primary survey, acute care, medical education, simulation.

Identifiers

PMID42559557
PMCPMC13441252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.