ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Transthoracic versus Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and esophagectomy remains the mainstay of curative treatment. The optimal surgical technique transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) versus transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) continues to be debated due to differences in surgical invasiveness and the extent of lymphadenectomy. This study aimed to compare clinical and oncological outcomes of TTE and THE in patients treated for ESCC. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent curative-intent esophagectomy for histologically confirmed ESCC between 2015 and 2023. Patients were categorized according to surgical approach (TTE vs THE), and demographic characteristics, perioperative data, pathological findings, postoperative complications, and survival outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: A total of 39 patients were analyzed (21 TTE, 18 THE). Baseline demographic features and most perioperative variables were comparable. TTE was associated with a significantly longer operative time and higher lymph node yield, whereas THE showed higher rates of intraoperative transfusion and pleural effusion. Other postoperative complications were similar between groups. The TTE approach demonstrated significantly better DFS ( Conclusion: TTE resulted in a greater lymph node yield and significantly improved DFS, indicating a clear oncologic advantage over the transhiatal approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.