Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42559507›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Predatory Billing by a Concierge Home Health Agency Following Acute Hospitalization.

Leela Rao, Jonah Swartzberg, Karen Galvez-Maquindang, Navid Darouian

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leela RaoMedicine, Occidental College, Los Angeles, USA.
Jonah SwartzbergMedicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
Karen Galvez-MaquindangInternal Medicine, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Navid DarouianInternal Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elder financial exploitation is an underrecognized form of elder abuse that can occur in medical and post-acute care settings. We present the case of a 74-year-old man with multiple comorbidities who was hospitalized following a mechanical fall with head trauma and concussion. During his inpatient stay, while experiencing residual altered mental status, he was approached by a representative of a concierge home health agency who presented discharge requirements inconsistent with those of his clinical team, resulting in the patient signing a costly contract for caregiver services that substantially exceeded his documented clinical needs both in scope and expense. The patient's family, despite repeated attempts to engage with discharge planning, was excluded from the decision. The contract was later identified as financially exploitative; a replacement agency provided equivalent care at approximately one-seventh the cost. This case illustrates a reproducible pattern of predatory conduct targeting cognitively vulnerable hospitalized elders and highlights systemic gaps in hospital discharge safeguards.

Indexed as

cognitive vulnerabilityconcierge caredischarge planningelder exploitationelder financial abusegeriatricshome health

Identifiers

PMID42559507
PMCPMC13440943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.