ArticleCureus2026
Predatory Billing by a Concierge Home Health Agency Following Acute Hospitalization.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elder financial exploitation is an underrecognized form of elder abuse that can occur in medical and post-acute care settings. We present the case of a 74-year-old man with multiple comorbidities who was hospitalized following a mechanical fall with head trauma and concussion. During his inpatient stay, while experiencing residual altered mental status, he was approached by a representative of a concierge home health agency who presented discharge requirements inconsistent with those of his clinical team, resulting in the patient signing a costly contract for caregiver services that substantially exceeded his documented clinical needs both in scope and expense. The patient's family, despite repeated attempts to engage with discharge planning, was excluded from the decision. The contract was later identified as financially exploitative; a replacement agency provided equivalent care at approximately one-seventh the cost. This case illustrates a reproducible pattern of predatory conduct targeting cognitively vulnerable hospitalized elders and highlights systemic gaps in hospital discharge safeguards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.