ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Emergency Gynecologic Surgery Outcomes During Working and Off-Hours.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare perioperative outcomes of emergency gynecologic surgeries performed during working hours and off-hours, and to evaluate temporal trends in surgical approach, particularly laparoscopy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent emergency surgery for ovarian torsion, ovarian cyst rupture, or ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy between January 1, 2020 and October 1, 2025 at a tertiary referral center. Patients were grouped according to surgical timing as working hours or off-hours. Demographic characteristics, surgical approach, operative time, hemoglobin decrease, transfusion requirement, hospital stay, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and reoperation were compared within each diagnostic group. Annual trends in surgical approach were also analyzed, and multivariable linear regression assessed the association of off-hours surgery with operative time and length of hospital stay. Results: A total of 386 patients were included: 69 with ovarian torsion, 77 with ovarian cyst rupture, and 240 with ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy. Most procedures were performed during off-hours. In ovarian torsion and ovarian cyst rupture, perioperative outcomes were comparable between groups. In ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy, operative time was longer during off-hours than during working hours and remained independently associated with off-hours surgery after adjustment, while hemoglobin decrease, transfusion requirement, hospital stay, complications, and reoperation rates were similar. The proportion of laparoscopic procedures increased from 17.9% in 2020 to 90.0% in the first 9 months of 2025. Conclusion: Off-hours emergency gynecologic surgery showed largely comparable outcomes to working-hours surgery. The marked shift toward laparoscopy suggests increasing integration of minimally invasive surgery into emergency gynecologic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.