ArticleCureus2026
Massive Ureterolithiasis in a Duplicated Ureter: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case study presents a patient with massive ureterolithiasis in a duplicated ureter. A 31-year-old female patient underwent two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans, which incidentally revealed an ossific pelvic mass identified by a chiropractor. Pelvic X-ray and CT confirmed ureterolithiasis measuring 6.08 cm x 1.92 cm. Two months later, she developed left-sided lumbar pain radiating to the lower extremity, left lower quadrant abdominal pain, urinary urgency, and persistent fever requiring hospitalization. Clinical investigations, including urinalysis, blood work, and CT, confirmed a urinary tract infection secondary to ureterolithiasis. A follow-up CT scan revealed a completely duplicated ureter on the left side that had been missed on prior studies. The patient was treated with multiple courses of antibiotics over six weeks with limited clinical improvement; subsequently, a ureteral stent was placed. Approximately one month later, the calculus spontaneously passed into the bladder, resulting in significant symptomatic relief. A follow-up CT scan revealed a completely duplicated ureter on the left side that had been missed on prior studies and revealed that the previously placed ureteral stent had been inadvertently inserted into the unobstructed ureter. This case highlights the importance of thorough imaging review, as the urological pathology was initially detected on a DEXA scan. Timely recognition and referral are essential to optimizing patient outcomes in atypical presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.