ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
Survey on the perception of practical training among neurosurgery residents at Sapienza University: Evaluation of the laboratory experience on cadavers in improving technical and theoretical skills.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neurosurgery is one of the most technically demanding medical specialties, requiring both high precision and knowledge of neuroanatomy. Surgical skill development begins in residency and continues throughout a neurosurgeon's career. Cadaveric dissection provides a realistic and effective environment for acquiring these competencies. Methods: A two-session course was organized at the [Microanatomical Neurosurgical Laboratory of I.R.C.C.S. Neuromed] microneuroanatomy laboratory. Progressive instruction was tailored to residents' training levels and included five neurosurgical approaches: Pterional and fronto-temporo-orbito-zygomatic, retrosigmoid, posterolateral, and endoscopic sellar. Each approach was divided into specific surgical steps using standard microsurgical instruments, microscopes, and endoscopes. Twenty-two residents participated and completed a post-course questionnaire evaluating organization, educational value, and practical outcomes. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 22 residents, 45% had never performed cadaver dissection before. Overall satisfaction was very high, especially for specimen quality (mean 4.73/5) and laboratory equipment (4.82/5). The endoscopic approach received the highest rating (4.86/5 for didactic value). Participants considered the course valuable for skill acquisition and strongly supported its funding. Suggestions included smaller groups per specimen, more preparation time, and longer duration. The program also fostered peer learning across training levels. Conclusion: Cadaver-based neurosurgical training enhances technical and anatomical skills in a safe, controlled environment. A structured, government-funded course was highly appreciated and considered crucial for residency education. This model is feasible, replicable, and should be promoted at a national level to improve hands-on neurosurgical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.