ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
Radiographic measurement of the C1 lateral mass for posterior atlantoaxial fixation in patients with a persistent first intersegmental artery.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Posterior C1-2 fixation with C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screws is an established treatment for atlantoaxial instability. In patients with a persistent first intersegmental artery (PFIA), the vertebral artery courses beneath the C1 posterior arch and may restrict safe C1 screw placement. This study quantified C1 lateral mass morphology in PFIA and assessed the radiographic feasibility of 3.5-mm screw placement. Methods: Cervical computed tomography angiograms or high-resolution computed tomography scans of 346 adults were retrospectively reviewed. Thirteen patients with PFIA, involving 14 sides, were compared with 26 age- and sex-matched controls. Parasagittal reconstructed images were used to measure C1 lateral mass and posterior arch dimensions. Vertical clearance for a 3.5-mm screw was assessed above the intact posterior arch and after simulated partial posterior arch notching. Results: PFIA was identified in 13 of 346 patients (3.8%). Overall, C1 lateral mass height and posterior arch thickness were preserved, whereas the inferior lateral mass was larger on the PFIA sides. Distance E was <3.5 mm in 10 of 14 PFIA sides (71%), whereas Distance F was ≥3.5 mm in 13 of 14 sides (93%). Conclusion: In PFIA, the intact posterior arch frequently limits the superior-entry C1 screw corridor. Partial posterior arch notching expanded the available corridor to ≥3.5 mm in approximately 90% of sides. Preoperative computed tomography angiography and individualized fixation planning are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.