Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42559320›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health behavior2026

Impact of FDA-approved graphic front-of-package health warnings on attention, package choice, and quit intentions.

Roberta Freitas-Lemos, Allison N Tegge, Devin C Tomlinson, Jacob Williams, Jeffrey S Stein, Marco A R Ferreira, Warren K Bickel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roberta Freitas-LemosFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Allison N TeggeFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Devin C TomlinsonFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Jacob WilliamsDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Jeffrey S SteinFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Marco A R FerreiraDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Warren K BickelFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA, USA.

Funding

Project 4: Effects of cigarette filter ventilation on cigarette appeal and preferences for combusted and noncombusted tobacco productsP01CA217806 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K, SHIELDS, PETER G. · 2017 to 2022
$12.6M
Development of an Integrated Framework of Abuse Liability and Toxicity Across Tobacco and Nicotine ProductsK01CA279490 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI Roberta Freitas-Lemos · 2023 to 2026
$620k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA279490NCI NIH HHS P01 CA217806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The FDA has the authority to regulate tobacco products, including the implementation of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging. This study examines the short-term effects of these front-of-package health warnings on smokers' attention, package preferences, and intentions to quit. Methods: A total of 951 smokers were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk. Participants completed an online survey that included demographic questions, measures of attention to warnings, package choice, and quit intention. Participants were randomly assigned to view cigarette packs with or without warnings. Results: First, exposure to warnings increased attention to the warning area (OR = 1.747, p = 0.0109), and increased the likelihood of choosing packages without warnings as prices increased (OR = 18.244, p<0.001). Additionally, focusing on the warning content also made smokers more likely to choose packages without warnings as price increased (OR = 5.025, p<0.001). However, warnings had no significant effect on quit intentions. Conclusions: Warnings effectively capture attention and influence cigarette package preferences, but their impact on quit intentions was not detectable after single exposure. These findings suggest that while warnings may affect short-term purchasing behavior, they are insufficient for driving cessation. Future research should investigate the long-term impact of warnings and consider other factors influencing quitting behavior.

Indexed as

cigarette packaginggraphic health warningssmoking cessationTobacco control

Identifiers

PMID42559320
PMCPMC13440363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.