Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42559199›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2026

Image quality evaluation of neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging using a deep learning reconstruction algorithm: A quantitative and multireader study using variable denoising levels at 3 tesla.

Zain Alvi, Eduardo P Reis, Mateus A Esmeraldo, David Shin, Suchandrima Banerjee, Hisham M Dahmoush, Andrew Campion, Stefanie Chambers, Yanniklas Kravutske, Sergios Gatidis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zain AlviMeharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2982-5925
Eduardo P ReisDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5110-457X
Mateus A EsmeraldoDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3537-9730
David ShinGE Health Care, Menlo Park, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3075-9259
Suchandrima BanerjeeGE Health Care, Menlo Park, California, United States.
Hisham M DahmoushDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9520-6305
Andrew CampionDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9407-3414
Stefanie ChambersDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna,Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6420-1154
Yanniklas KravutskeDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna,Vienna, Austria.
Sergios GatidisDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States.
Bruno P SoaresDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4185-6940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Neonatal imaging is particularly challenging because newborns are prone to head motion, which can degrade image quality and complicate interpretation. Improving brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image quality may help reduce diagnostic uncertainty and facilitate the nuanced assessment of early myelinating structures in the neonatal brain. Although deep learning reconstruction algorithms designed to improve MRI image quality have been evaluated in pediatric imaging, they have not been specifically studied in exclusively neonatal populations. This pilot study sought to evaluate image quality improvement through the employment of a deep learning reconstruction algorithm in neonatal brain imaging. Materials and Methods: 3D T1-weighted brain MRIs were obtained in a small cohort of 15 neonates. A deep learning reconstruction algorithm was applied to the image sets using low, medium, and high levels of denoising. Three radiologists qualitatively rated image quality (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], presence of artifacts, and overall clarity) on a 4-point scale of eight early myelinating structures. Objective apparent SNR (aSNR) and apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (aCNR), based on signal intensities of white and gray matter, were measured across all three denoising levels. Results: Evaluation by radiologists indicated an overall increase in all image quality categories and increased conspicuity of the early myelinating structures as the level of denoising increased. Objective aSNR and aCNR values also increased progressively with denoising, with significant differences observed for nearly all pairwise comparisons. Conclusion: Our findings suggest improvement in image quality with the use of the deep learning reconstruction algorithm in 3D T1-weighted neonatal brain MRI, though the small sample size and pilot design limit generalizability. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes were not evaluated and warrant future investigation.

Indexed as

Deep learning reconstructionImage quality improvementMagnetic resonance imagingNeonatal brainNeuroradiology

Identifiers

PMID42559199
PMCPMC13440578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.