ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Interpreting combined BALF-galactomannan and next-generation sequencing in pulmonary aspergillosis and mucormycosis: a two-center clinical decision framework.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To identify which patients with pulmonary aspergillosis or mucormycosis (PAM) derive the greatest incremental diagnostic benefit from next-generation sequencing (NGS) beyond conventional microbiology, and to derive a GM × NGS interpretive framework that identifies the patient subgroup in which NGS adds the most information, based on routinely available bedside variables. Secondary objectives were to characterize the pathogen spectrum detected by NGS, quantify pairwise concordance with BALF galactomannan and culture, and assess the relationship between quantitative Aspergillus reads and BALF-GM intensity. Methods: Two-center retrospective case-cohort study of 595 adults with NGS-tested pulmonary aspergillosis or mucormycosis (PAM; proven, probable, or possible per EORTC/MSGERC and ECMM-MSGERC criteria). Primary method-comparison analysis was restricted to the strict subset with NGS, BALF-galactomannan (GM), and culture all available ( Results: In the strict 434-case subset, NGS fungal-signal positivity was 81.3%, BALF-GM (≥0.8) 58.1%, and culture 43.1%; pairwise overlap was substantial but incomplete. The GM-negative/NGS-positive subgroup ( Conclusion: When BALF-GM and NGS are co-ordered on the same lavage in routine PAM workup, the four GM × NGS quadrants define distinct clinical phenotypes with concrete management implications: NGS positivity in GM-negative cases (34.6%) carries the highest incremental yield and a milder phenotype; conversely, a negative NGS in GM-positive cases must not be used to rule out severe PAM. Across quadrants, NGS adds species- and co-pathogen-level information that changes therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.