ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2026
Enhancing nursing students' moral sensitivity through the World Cafe and ethical decision-making simulation to address diverse learning styles.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teachers' instructional strategies and students' learning styles are key determinants of learning effectiveness. This study examined whether the World Cafe teaching strategy and the Four-Topic Approach to ethical decision-making could enhance outcomes in nursing ethics education. A total of 250 nursing students participated in this study. Two instructional strategies were implemented during the semester: (1) the World Cafe teaching strategy and (2) the Four-Topic Approach. Pretests and post-tests were administered. Learning-style classifications included visual (n = 106), auditory (n = 96), and kinesthetic (n = 124). Additionally, 50 students demonstrated a single learning style, 54 demonstrated two learning styles (eg, visual-auditory, auditory-kinesthetic, or kinesthetic-visual), and 56 demonstrated all three learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic). Eighty-eight students could not be assigned to any learning-style category. Overall, 110 students (44%) exhibited two learning styles. Significant correlations were observed between the use of multiple teaching strategies and nursing students' learning styles (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.