ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Determinants of proliferation and involution in infantile hemangioma: macrophage crosstalk, endothelial plasticity, and metabolic rewiring.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infantile hemangioma (IH) follows a characteristic clinical course, yet the mechanisms that sustain rapid postnatal growth and later permit fibrofatty regression remain incompletely resolved. This gap has practical consequences, because some lesions threaten function, some respond incompletely to propranolol, and residual tissue change can remain important after growth arrest. Recent studies have expanded the field beyond classical angiogenic signaling to include phase-specific cell states, macrophage-endothelial crosstalk, and endothelial metabolism, but these advances are usually discussed separately. In this review, we prioritize human lesion tissue, patient-linked phase-resolved data, and primary hemangioma endothelial cell (HemEC)/hemangioma stem cell (HemSC) studies, while using cell-line and xenograft systems mainly for mechanistic dissection. Across these evidence tiers, the evidence points to a phase-linked model. Proliferative IH is supported by reciprocal signaling among hemangioma stem cells, endothelial cells, mural cells, and activated macrophages; enhanced glycolysis and selective amino acid use sustain endothelial growth; M2-skewed macrophage signals promote endothelial proliferation and differentiation; and HemSC-derived cues protect macrophages from ferroptosis through NRF2-GPX4. Involution appears to involve loss of this supportive niche, increased lipid peroxidation, and cell-state shifts that permit mesenchymal and adipogenic differentiation. However, endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition should not be treated as uniformly regressive: inflammatory EndMT linked to M1 cytokines differs from TGF-β1-driven programs that can still enhance migration and angiogenesis. That distinction is relevant for biomarker design and therapeutic targeting. We argue that the most informative next steps are phase-resolved human cohorts, spatial validation of macrophage and endothelial states, and early translational studies that pair standard therapy with rational inhibitors of glycolysis, PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling, or macrophage survival pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.