ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Electrophysiological biomarkers for foundational signal markers in chronic pancreatitis using machine learning models.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) experience abdominal pain, but the pathophysiology differs. We aimed to investigate whether using only electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) could be used to identify distinct differences between healthy controls and people with CP with and without pain. Methods: This study utilised cross-sectional data from a multicentre research project, including healthy controls ( Results: Classifying differences between all CP patients and controls yielded 78% F1-score (both EEG and ECG) using a support vector machine. Classifying differences between CP patients with and without pain was less precise, with a maximum 63% F1-score (both EEG and ECG) using a support vector machine. Overall, EEG and ECG improved classifications by up to 10 percentage points. Adding the cold pressor (tonic pain) condition did not reliably change the separation between patients with and without pain, which remained near chance. Discussion: The classification helps to show the importance of potential EEG and ECG measures in characterization of chronic pancreatitis and pain. Future work should focus on incorporating other disease-specific features in the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.