Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558995›Full record

ReviewAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology2026

Nitin Gupta, Partha S Choudhury, Amit Rana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nitin GuptaDepartment of nuclear medicine, Dr Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College and Hospital, Tanda, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Partha S ChoudhuryDepartment of nuclear medicine, RGCIRC New Delhi, India.
Amit RanaDepartment of oncology, Dr Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College and Hospital, Tanda, Kangra,Himachal Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Gastric carcinoma is a major cause of cancer related mortality worldwide. Accurate staging, including detection of nodal and distant metastases, is essential for treatment planning. Conventional Methods: This review followed PRISMA 2020 recommendations. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251056976). PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane libraries were searched from January 2016 to December 2023 for clinical studies evaluating Results: Fourteen studies (661 patients) were included; nine provided head to head comparisons with Conclusions:

Indexed as

68Ga-FAPIFibroblast activation protein StagingGastric carcinomaMeta-analysisPET/CT

Identifiers

PMID42558995
PMCPMC13438367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.