Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558916›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2026

From simulator to patient: transfer of procedural skills to practice in cardiac device implantation.

Jorio Mascheroni, Martin Stockburger, Ashish Patwala, Hartwig Retzlaff, Anthony G Gallagher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jorio MascheroniFaculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1618-3169
Martin StockburgerDepartment of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Havelland Kliniken, Ketziner Straße 21, Nauen 14641, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6927-9420
Ashish PatwalaDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 6QG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3166-0816
Hartwig RetzlaffTraining Concept Consulting, Alpenstrasse 14a, Groebenzell D-82194, Germany.
Anthony G GallagherFaculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-5613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) training for novice implanters typically occurs Methods and results: Prospective observational cohort study following participants from a prior multinational randomized simulation trial to assess transfer of training to clinical practice. Early-career implanters (≥20 prior pacemaker/defibrillator cases; limited CRT first-operator experience) reported the implant technique they applied in their first two routine clinical cases within 30 days of training, using a validated standardized performance metrics form assessing surgical and lead implantation steps. The primary outcome was the mean percentage of deviations from optimal technique per participant.Of 30 randomized participants, 21 (70%) submitted 42 case reports (10 PBP, 11 SBT). Baseline characteristics were similar, and case complexity did not differ between groups ( Conclusion: Metrics-based PBP training was associated with significantly fewer procedural deviations from optimal CIED implant technique during early clinical practice compared with traditional simulation. These findings support benchmark-based simulation as a strategy to improve early clinical skill transfer in cardiac electrophysiology.

Indexed as

Cardiac resynchronization therapyMetricsPacingProficiency-based progressionSkillTraining

Identifiers

PMID42558916
PMCPMC13439315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.