ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Esthetic Perception of Gingival Display by Laypeople and Diagnostic Impressions and Etiologic Attribution of Gummy Smile by Dental Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Esthetic Perception of Gingival Display by Laypeople and Diagnostic Impressions and Etiologic Attribution of Gummy Smile by Dental Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the diagnostic impressions of gummy smiles and perceived etiologic attribution among general practitioner (GP) dentists and dental specialists and compared the esthetic perception of gingival display between dental professionals and laypeople. Materials and Methods: Twelve digitally modified smile photographs were generated from a master photograph by altering gingival margin levels and lip position using Adobe Photoshop. A questionnaire was administered to five groups: GP dentists, periodontists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, and laypeople (50 per group; Results: Significant intergroup differences in esthetic perception were observed for most photographs ( Conclusions: Esthetic perception of gingival display varies significantly among dental specialists and between professionals and laypeople. Differences were also observed in the diagnostic impressions and perceived etiologic attribution of gummy smiles among dental specialties. These findings highlight the subjective nature of gummy smile assessment and emphasize the importance of considering both professional evaluation and patient perception during esthetic treatment planning. Clinical Significance: The findings of this study demonstrate that the esthetic perception of gingival display, diagnostic impressions of gummy smile, and perceived etiologic attribution may vary between dental professionals and laypeople. Awareness of these differences may facilitate interdisciplinary communication and support a more comprehensive and patient-centered approach to the assessment of gummy smiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.