Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558905›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026

Esthetic Perception of Gingival Display by Laypeople and Diagnostic Impressions and Etiologic Attribution of Gummy Smile by Dental Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Nimet Turan, Priti Charde, Esra Guzeldemir-Akcakanat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nimet TuranPrivate Practice, Kocaeli, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7752-6927
Priti ChardeCollege of Dental Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar, qu.edu.qa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5497-7832
Esra Guzeldemir-AkcakanatCollege of Dental Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar, qu.edu.qa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0204-9487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the diagnostic impressions of gummy smiles and perceived etiologic attribution among general practitioner (GP) dentists and dental specialists and compared the esthetic perception of gingival display between dental professionals and laypeople. Materials and Methods: Twelve digitally modified smile photographs were generated from a master photograph by altering gingival margin levels and lip position using Adobe Photoshop. A questionnaire was administered to five groups: GP dentists, periodontists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, and laypeople (50 per group; Results: Significant intergroup differences in esthetic perception were observed for most photographs ( Conclusions: Esthetic perception of gingival display varies significantly among dental specialists and between professionals and laypeople. Differences were also observed in the diagnostic impressions and perceived etiologic attribution of gummy smiles among dental specialties. These findings highlight the subjective nature of gummy smile assessment and emphasize the importance of considering both professional evaluation and patient perception during esthetic treatment planning. Clinical Significance: The findings of this study demonstrate that the esthetic perception of gingival display, diagnostic impressions of gummy smile, and perceived etiologic attribution may vary between dental professionals and laypeople. Awareness of these differences may facilitate interdisciplinary communication and support a more comprehensive and patient-centered approach to the assessment of gummy smiles.

Indexed as

gingival displaygummy smilesmile estheticssmile linevisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID42558905
PMCPMC13438864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.