Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558894›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026

How to Manage the Spinoglenoid Notch Cyst: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Abdullah B Chandasir, Ryan M Lew, Lord J Hyeamang, Asim A Khan, Nurudeen K Alli, Zaamin B Hussain, Gregory P Nicholson, Grant E Garrigues

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abdullah B ChandasirMedical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Ryan M LewMidwest Orthopedics at Rush, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Lord J HyeamangRush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5205-048X
Asim A KhanRush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Nurudeen K AlliRush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Zaamin B HussainMidwest Orthopedics at Rush, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Gregory P NicholsonMidwest Orthopedics at Rush, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Grant E GarriguesMidwest Orthopedics at Rush, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8662-3131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinoglenoid notch cysts can cause suprascapular nerve compression, posterior shoulder pain, and infraspinatus weakness. Although multiple open and arthroscopic operative approaches have been described, the optimal management strategy remains unclear. Purpose: To (1) analyze existing evidence on the management of spinoglenoid notch cysts, (2) compare outcomes among different operative approaches, and (3) provide a practical management algorithm based on cyst characteristics. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, using the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases from inception to August 2025. Eligible studies included clinical reports on the operative or nonoperative management of spinoglenoid notch cysts, with postoperative outcomes. Data on patient characteristics, procedures, patient-reported outcome measures, recurrence, reoperation, and complication rates were extracted. Random- and common-effects models were used for pooled analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. Results: A total of 32 studies comprising 562 shoulders met the inclusion criteria. Overall risk of bias was moderate. Arthroscopic decompression with labral repair was the most common intervention (n = 271 [48%]). Across all studies, significant improvements were observed in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Constant-Murley, and visual analog scale pain scores. Meta-analysis revealed the lowest cyst recurrence rate for arthroscopic decompression with labral repair (3% [95% CI, 0.02-0.06]), compared with arthroscopic decompression alone (12%), arthroscopic labral repair alone (6%), and open decompression (12%). Reoperation rates were lowest with open decompression (0%) and arthroscopic labral repair (3%-4%), and highest with arthroscopic decompression without labral repair (9%). Complication rates were uniformly low across all techniques (<5%). Conclusion: Arthroscopic decompression with concurrent labral repair demonstrated favorable outcomes and low recurrence rates in properly selected patients with spinoglenoid notch cysts. Both arthroscopic and open approaches yield excellent pain relief and functional recovery. Arthroscopic decompression with labral repair offers a safe, effective, and minimally invasive option for nonloculated cysts. For very large and/or loculated cysts, open decompression with removal of the cyst structure itself should be considered.

Indexed as

arthroscopic decompressionopen decompressionspinoglenoid notch cystsuprascapular nerve entrapment

Identifiers

PMID42558894
PMCPMC13438244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.