ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Volumetric brain alterations in children with primary complex motor stereotypies: a baseline and longitudinal report.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Primary complex motor stereotypies (pCMS) are early-onset, repetitive movements in otherwise typically developing children. Although symptoms often improve during adolescence, neuroanatomical mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of movements and symptom reduction remails unclear. Structural MRI studies have implicated multiple structures within cortical-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuits, but findings have been inconsistent and limited by small, cross-sectional childhood cohorts. It remains unclear whether reported volumetric differences represent static markers of pCMS or developmental changes related to clinical severity. Methods: Volumetric MRI examined frontal cortical, basal ganglia, and cerebellar regional volumes in participants with pCMS and typically developing (TD) controls at childhood (8-12 years) and adolescence/young adulthood (15-23 years). Cross-sectional analyses evaluated diagnostic effects on regional volumes (childhood: pCMS Results: Cross-sectional analyses in childhood revealed smaller left putamen volume and an association of smaller medial prefrontal volume with greater clinical severity in pCMS (neither finding survived FDR correction). Cerebellar analyses demonstrated larger anterior vermis gray matter and smaller anterior and posterior white matter volumes (surviving FDR correction); furthermore, larger cerebellar volumes were nominally associated with greater clinical severity (not surviving FDR correction). In adolescence/young adulthood, no frontal lobe or basal ganglia differences were detected. Cerebellar analyses identified nominally smaller anterior white matter volumes and associations between larger posterior white matter volumes and greater clinical severity (neither finding survived FDR correction). Longitudinal analyses revealed within-subject increases in frontal lobe gray matter volumes (predominantly right hemisphere), was associated with increased pCMS severity (not surviving FDR correction). Conclusions: Findings suggest that pCMS may be associated with regionally specific and developmentally dynamic structural differences rather than a single neuroanatomical abnormality. Childhood cerebellar sensorimotor regions demonstrated volumetric differences, while additional cross-sectional and longitudinal findings raise the possibility that frontal cortical, basal ganglia, and cerebellar regions may contribute differentially to stereotypy severity across development. Collectively, these findings are consistent with, but do not establish a circuit-level framework for understanding pCMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.