ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Autism prevalence and the limits of diagnostic expansion: a perspective on diagnostic validity, adult assessment, and phenotypic stratification.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reported prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has risen dramatically over the past two decades. Although increased awareness, broader diagnostic criteria, and improved access to assessment have corrected historical under-identification, this diagnostic expansion also raises a significant methodological concern: the risk of diagnostic dilution. Increasingly, surveillance systems and clinical cohorts may include individuals whose phenotypic profiles, developmental histories, and functional impairments do not fully align with a developmentally anchored neurodevelopmental presentation of ASD. This challenge is particularly acute in adolescent and adult assessments, where developmental history may be incomplete and standardized instruments or self-report measures may show limited specificity when applied to clinically complex psychiatric populations. Conflating developmentally anchored ASD with partially overlapping clinical phenotypes may reduce the signal-to-noise ratio in genetic, biomarker, neuroimaging, and therapeutic research, contributing to findings that are difficult to replicate or interpret. To preserve diagnostic validity, this Perspective argues that best-estimate clinical diagnosis must be grounded in rigorous developmental anchoring, collateral information, and judicious clinical judgment. It further proposes a set of core stratification domains for systematic phenotypic stratification, including age at first concern and diagnosis, biological sex and sex-related ascertainment factors, language and cognitive trajectories, adaptive functioning, intellectual disability, psychiatric comorbidities, ascertainment source, diagnostic instruments used, collateral developmental documentation, and support needs and functional impairment across contexts and over time. Stratification should not be understood as a restriction on clinical access, but as a scientific requirement for meaningful prevalence estimates and biologically informative autism research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.