SynthesisFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Navigating airports: a scoping review of physical access challenges and experiences for persons with disabilities.
Synthesis in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Airports present a uniquely complex environment for travelers with disabilities, where the promise of global mobility often collides with persistent physical, sensory, and procedural barriers. This scoping review synthesizes peer-reviewed and gray literature to examine the physical environment of airports and how it shapes access for persons with disabilities, including the interaction between spatial features and service-related components in real-world travel situations. Guided by Fougeyrollas's five-dimensional framework of access availability, accessibility, acceptability, affordability, and usability the review examines how each dimension shapes real-world travel experiences from curb to gate. The results suggest that, in the reviewed studies, accessibility often appears fragmented across the airport journey, with infrastructures that may be present but not always usable, available, or meaningfully integrated into the travel experience. Access often relies on assistance-based models, and important gaps remain in addressing diverse user needs, particularly for individuals with invisible disabilities. At the same time, the literature highlights promising practices and ongoing improvements, including digital wayfinding tools, dedicated assistance services, and growing attention to inclusive design principles. Overall, this review emphasizes that accessibility cannot be reduced to regulatory compliance or the mere presence of infrastructure. Rather, it must be understood as a dynamic and continuous process shaped by the interaction between environments and diverse human needs throughout the airport journey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.