Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558814›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026

Supporting homecare workers to provide palliative and end-of-life care: A scoping review of interventions and their implementation.

Lesley E Williamson, Annika Dhawan, Fatima Mujtabah, Ai Qi Katrina Yeung, Monica Leverton, Katherine E Sleeman, Abigail Burgess, Clare Ellis-Smith, Catherine J Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lesley E WilliamsonCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3807-7498
Annika DhawanCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2533-314X
Fatima MujtabahCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
Ai Qi Katrina YeungCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
Monica LevertonHealth and Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6678-5865
Katherine E SleemanCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9777-4373
Abigail BurgessHealth and Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK.
Clare Ellis-SmithCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3453-3203
Catherine J EvansCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social homecare workers provide care to enable people to live as independently as possible in their own homes. They play a central role in supporting palliative and end-of-life care but often encounter challenges and can feel disempowered. Objectives: We aimed to scope the evidence on interventions to support homecare workers' provision of palliative and end-of-life care, and the contextual factors that influence their implementation. Eligibility Criteria: Papers were included if they reported primary research of any design, evaluating any intervention supporting homecare workers to provide palliative and end-of-life care. Sources of Evidence: We systematically searched four bibliographic databases and supplemented this with reference chaining and grey literature searching. Charting Methods: Using a qualitative content analysis, we deductively mapped data against the four contextual domains of the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model. Results: We found 13 papers reporting interventions to support homecare workers to provide palliative and end-of-life care, of which only seven described contextual factors that influence their implementation. The most common intervention type was training, and most cited contextual factors related to homecare workers' perspectives of the intervention. Characteristics relating to homecare workers' schedules and agency staff turnover were also described as influencing implementation of interventions. However, few reported the influence of the perspectives or characteristics of managers, people receiving homecare, and families. Only two of the seven papers mentioned the influence of the external environment or infrastructure to promote implementation and sustainability of interventions. Conclusions: The scarcity of evidence on interventions and their implementation is a missed opportunity to support the homecare sector's response to increasing demand for community-based care and reduced hospital deaths. Better understanding of how the workforce can be supported to provide palliative and end-of-life care, in a sustainable way, would help facilitate high-quality care at home for people approaching the end of life.

Indexed as

domiciliary careend of life carehomecarehome health aideimplementationpalliative care

Identifiers

PMID42558814
PMCPMC13438218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.