SynthesisFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Reporting practices and sourcing of food images in fMRI research: implications for reproducibility.
Synthesis in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fMRI literature has accumulated many studies that investigated the neural correlates of viewing food images. However, there has been no literature survey to provide an overall understanding of which food image datasets were used by these studies. To address this gap, a meta-research was conducted to identify if the fMRI studies used food images from established datasets and exactly from which datasets. The online database of Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) was queried to identify relevant papers. After screening, the analysis consisted of data manually extracted from 490 papers published during 2001-2024. Approximately 53.7% of the 490 analyzed papers did not specify their source of food images. About 29.8% of papers referred to published datasets for their food images, whereas some papers utilized a combination of online stock photo and in-house library. The most frequently cited food image datasets were IAPS and Blechert et al. (2014). The popularity of IAPS seemed to be declining since the mid-2010s in favor of newer datasets such as Blechert et al. (2014), Charbonnier et al. (2016), and Blechert et al. (2019). Some datasets are no longer accessible or have changed their websites. The findings highlight substantial heterogeneity and underreporting of visual stimulus materials, which may contribute to variability in observed neural responses and limit cross-study comparability in fMRI research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.