ReviewVeterinary medicine international2026
Active Learning Strategies in Veterinary Medicine: A Literature Review.
Review in Veterinary medicine international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Active Learning Strategies in Veterinary Medicine: A Literature Review.Veterinary medicine international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many different active learning strategies that help students engage and interact with their own learning exist, and these range from simple, low-technology, individual-focused solutions to more complex, time-intensive group activities that require extensive preparation and access to technology. While active learning is becoming increasingly emphasized in the veterinary curriculum, a robust and recent review describing the techniques used in the veterinary field is not readily available. PubMed and ERIC databases were searched using the terms "active learning/teaching" and "student centered/focused." Ultimately, 147 references underwent full-text reviews, with active learning techniques categorized into three primary domains: collaborative activities, individual tasks, and educational gaming and simulation. Features of techniques within each category are summarized, as are some of the advantages versus limitations, previously published student and instructor experiences, examples, and outcomes. While there are numerous published studies from the health professions, those focused on veterinary medicine are few and often limited to qualitative or descriptive data with survey-based outcomes. While no method is a panacea for successful learning, our purpose was to highlight the existing best practices, delineating the status of active learning in veterinary medicine. More quantitative evidence on its effectiveness and impact in veterinary medicine can be gathered in the future to further guide teachers and educators.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.