Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558618›Full record

ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2026

Student-Generated Questions as Opportunities for Sensemaking in Undergraduate Biology.

S Dabholkar, S Benjamin, Y Wang, J Svoboda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S DabholkarIndian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, Maharashtra 411008, India.
S BenjaminBunker Hill Community College, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
Y WangMount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA 01075, USA.
J SvobodaTufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2228-9066

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in science education highlights the value of sensemaking-the process of identifying gaps in understanding and constructing explanations to fill them-for student learning and engagement. Yet college students often perceive undergraduate biology classrooms as prioritizing correct answers over their own questions and ideas. In this paper, we argue that eliciting students' questions about what they find confusing can create opportunities for them to engage in creative and critical thinking to make sense of biological phenomena. We illustrate this conceptual argument with examples drawn from three interviews with college students about evolutionary biology. We show how framing interviews around students' questions led to productive biological sensemaking and conclude by discussing implications for how biology instructors might foster a sensemaking approach in their classrooms.

Identifiers

PMID42558618
PMCPMC13438076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.