ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Respiratory symptoms in Ecuadorian workers associated with informal labor and cantonal satellite pollution metrics.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Evidence on the association between ambient pollution and occupational hazards in Ecuador remains limited. This cross-sectional study evaluated the association between working conditions, satellite-derived ambient pollutants, geographic factors, and respiratory symptoms. Methods: We analyzed 1,807 workers across four sectors. Respiratory symptoms (ECRHS) were cross-referenced with Sentinel-5P telemetry, utilizing z-score standardized environmental variables and selecting optimal spatial/temporal concentration percentiles (p25, p50, p75, and p95) via the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) for each outcome. Multivariable penalized logistic regression (Firth's method) identified factors associated with respiratory symptoms. Results: Informal employment showed the strongest association with respiratory symptoms, including asthma (aOR 12.56; 95% CI: 5.09-32.87), wheezing (aOR 6.78; 95% CI: 1.83-27.89), chronic cough (aOR 4.14; 95% CI: 2.26-7.74), and chronic phlegm (aOR 2.53; 95% CI: 1.39-4.67). Direct workplace chemical inhalation, compounded by a complete lack of risk awareness, was associated with significantly higher odds for asthma, wheezing, and chronic cough. Geospatially, after controlling for canton-level altitude-which acted as an independent protective factor against asthma (aOR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.93)-nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) emerged as the primary independent environmental predictors for chronic phlegm and cough, while ozone lost statistical significance. Discussion/conclusion: Informal employment and unprotected chemical inhalation are strongly associated with respiratory symptoms, frequently exceeding the risks observed in traditional high-exposure sectors. Furthermore, regional atmospheric pollution showed a significant statistical association with chronic respiratory outcomes at the cantonal level. Integrating high-resolution aerospace monitoring into occupational health surveillance represents a potential strategy to address these overlapping structural vulnerabilities; however, causal inference remains limited by the cross-sectional design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.