ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Hypomethylating agents are the current therapy backbone for MDS and AML relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relapse of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor prognosis and remains the most common cause of treatment failure following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Over the past two decades, hypomethylating agents (HMAs), particularly azacytidine, have evolved from an experimental approach to the current therapeutic backbone of relapse therapy following alloHSCT, although future treatment paradigms may further evolve with emerging targeted and immunotherapeutic approaches. The RELAZA studies demonstrated that preemptive therapy with azacytidine in molecular relapse can significantly delay the onset of hematologic relapse. However, sustained disease control generally requires additional immunological mechanisms. Against this backdrop, the combination of azacytidine-either alone or in combination regimens-with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) has been established as a successful salvage strategy. Numerous studies have consistently shown over the years that a low disease burden, molecular rather than hematological relapse, and a longer interval between transplant and relapse are associated with better response rates and prolonged survival. This underscores the great importance of MRD monitoring for enabling early intervention. Prognostic models such as the APSS-R score incorporate these factors. Additionally, the score takes into account pre-transplant therapy, thereby underscoring the importance of a biologically tailored treatment strategy to prevent the emergence of treatment-resistant clones. Recent combination therapies with targeted agents, such as FLT3 and IDH inhibitors, as well as with venetoclax or lenalidomide, are showing promising results. Future strategies will likely focus on individualized, biological1ly guided treatment approaches and a selective indication for second alloHSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.