Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558499›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Avidity of autoantibodies against type I interferons as a factor associated with neurological complications in severe COVID-19.

Mario Framil, Lydia García-Serrano, Adrián García-García, Inés Caballero-Segarra, Jose Luis Gomez-Vazquez, Arnau Antolí, Xavier Solanich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mario FramilImmunology Department, Centre Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Lydia García-SerranoUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Adrián García-GarcíaImmunology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Inés Caballero-SegarraImmunology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Jose Luis Gomez-VazquezUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Arnau AntolíUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier SolanichUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autoantibodies against type I interferons (IFNs), particularly IFN-α2 and IFN-ω, are a recognized risk factor for severe COVID-19. Their functional characterization has largely focused on their neutralizing capacity. However, antibody binding avidity represents a distinct biophysical parameter that may be physiopathologically relevant. Whether avidity contributes to clinical outcomes in patient cohorts has not been evaluated. Methods: We characterized the avidity of IgG autoantibodies against IFN-α2 and IFN-ω by urea-dissociation ELISA in 95 patients with severe COVID-19 and confirmed anti-type I IFN autoantibodies. Avidity was classified as high (avidity index > 0.6) or low (avidity index ≤ 0.6). Clinical outcomes were compared between avidity groups, and patients were additionally stratified by combined avidity and neutralization profiles. Concordance between antibody subtypes was assessed by Cohen's kappa. Results: Among 95 patients, 75 were positive for anti-IFN-α2 autoantibodies (51 high, 24 low avidity) and 49 for anti-IFN-ω autoantibodies (31 high, 18 low avidity). Low anti-IFN-α2 avidity was significantly associated with neurological complications (6/24 [25%] vs. 3/51 [6%]; OR 0.21 [0.05-0.84]; p = 0.026). For anti-IFN-ω, a non-significant trend in the same direction was observed (3/18 [17%] vs. 2/31 [6%]; p = 0.342). Avidity and neutralizing capacity were related but not interchangeable, with a low positive predictive value of avidity for neutralization (47% for anti-IFN-α2, 16% for anti-IFN-ω). Stratification by the combined avidity/neutralization phenotype identified the low-avidity + non-neutralizing combination of anti-IFN-α2 autoantibodies as the subgroup with the highest neurological complication rate (6/18 [33%]). Concordance between anti-IFN-α2 and anti-IFN-ω avidity was modest (Cohen's κ = 0.24; 62% concordant). Conclusion: Antibody avidity is a functional characteristic of anti-type I IFN autoantibodies associated with neurological complications in severe COVID-19. In our cohort, avidity and neutralizing capacity are related but not equivalent, as a substantial proportion of high-avidity antibodies lack neutralizing activity, and the modest concordance between subtypes further suggests that these two autoantibody responses are partially independent. The combined assessment of avidity and neutralization identifies patients at higher neurological risk than either parameter alone, supporting avidity as an additional informative parameter in the functional characterization of anti-type I IFN autoantibodies.

Indexed as

Antibody AffinityAutoantibodiesCOVID-19Interferon-alphaInterferon Type INervous System DiseasesSARS-CoV-2AdultAgedAntibodies, NeutralizingFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAutoantibodiesImmunoglobulin GInterferon-alphainterferon omega 1Interferon Type Iantibody avidityanti-type I IFN autoantibodiesCOVID-19IFN-αIFN-ωneurological complicationsneutralizing autoantibodiesType I interferons

Identifiers

PMID42558499
PMCPMC13437550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.