ArticleNature and science of sleep2026
"Schrödinger's Rat": Testing Consciousness Under Anesthesia Alters Brain State and Neuronal Responses in Auditory Cortex.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: In anesthesia research and clinical practice, the level of consciousness is often assessed by stimulating subjects and observing their responses. It is possible that such stimulation alters the very state of consciousness being assessed. Whether this phenomenon is accompanied by specific cortical activities remains unknown. Here, we tested the effects of behavioral assessments on neuronal activity in the rat primary auditory cortex (A1) and perirhinal cortex (PrC). Methods: Neuronal spiking activity was recorded from microwire arrays targeting A1 and/or PrC in rats (n = 9), whilst presenting 40 Hz click-trains and gradually increasing infusion rates of propofol, remifentanil, ketamine or dexmedetomidine. We assessed righting reflex, pain withdrawal, whisking reflex, and corneal reflex every 12 minutes (every 360 auditory trials). We searched for significant changes in baseline firing rate and stimulus-evoked activities (where present) due to the behavioral assessments, by comparing 4 min intervals before and after the behavioral tests. Results: Out of 1004 units in 20 sessions, we found significantly elevated activity (p < 0.01) following behavioral tests in 32% and 20% of A1 auditory-responsive units and 8.6% and 5.3% of auditory-unresponsive units under propofol and dexmedetomidine, respectively, but not under remifentanil or ketamine. A higher proportion of units modulated their firing following behavioral tests in A1 compared to PrC, with median gains ranging from +0.23 to +1.06, depending on the specific response feature. Conclusion: Behavioral testing increases ongoing firing rate and responses to sounds in some cortical neurons. This increase is more prevalent in A1 than in PrC, mirroring clinical observations that patients exhibit basic responses under sedation, while complex processing, such as memory encoding, is impaired. The degree of neuronal modulation due to behavioral testing varies between anesthetic agents, mirroring their clinical phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.