ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Dose optimization of sacubitril/valsartan in Chinese chronic heart failure patients: integration of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and real-world data.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In routine clinical practice, many patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) treated with sacubitril/valsartan do not achieve the guideline-recommended target dose of 200 mg twice daily (BID), largely because of tolerability concerns. This study aimed to develop a model-informed framework to evaluate whether sacubitril/valsartan 100 mg BID may provide adequate expected pharmacodynamic benefit with improved tolerability in Chinese CHF patients who are unable to tolerate further dose escalation. Methods: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of sacubitril/valsartan was developed in PK-Sim and evaluated against observed clinical data. Physiological changes were incorporated to extrapolate the model to healthy Chinese subjects, patients with renal impairment, and patients with CHF. Real-world clinical data from Chinese CHF patients with hypertension were used to inform virtual population. PBPK-predicted steady-state exposure metrics were then linked to externally sourced exposure-biomarker relationships for NT-proBNP and to a blood pressure response model to compare expected biomarker response and hypotension-related tolerability across dosing strategies. Results: The PBPK model adequately described the pharmacokinetic profiles of sacubitril, sacubitrilat, and valsartan across different populations and dosing regimens. Overall, 88.75% of predicted-to-observed exposure ratios were within 1.5-fold and 98.75% were within the conventional two-fold boundary, with average fold error and absolute average fold error values below 2. CHF and renal impairment were associated with increased systemic exposure, particularly for sacubitrilat, consistent with its renal elimination pathway. In under-titrated CHF patients, exposure-biomarker translation indicated limited additional NT-proBNP reduction when the regimen was escalated from 100 mg BID to 200 mg BID, suggesting a relatively flat exposure-biomarker relationship over this dose range. In contrast, escalation to 200 mg BID was associated with greater predicted systolic blood pressure reduction and greater hypotension-related tolerability concern. Conclusion: This PBPK-based model-informed framework supports the guideline-recommended target dose of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg BID when tolerated, while providing exploratory model-informed evidence that 100 mg BID may represent a feasible alternative for patients with limited tolerance to further dose escalation. Prospective validation using longitudinal biomarker, tolerability, and clinical outcome data is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.