Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558439›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for diabetes mellitus with depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yuqing Zhang, Shilin Liu, Andong Li, Zheng Nan

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuqing ZhangChangchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Shilin LiuChangchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Andong LiAffiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Zheng NanAffiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in patients with diabetes mellitus and comorbid depression. Methods: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261305439). Eight electronic databases were searched up to February 11, 2026 for randomized controlled trials comparing SSRIs plus usual care versus control. Outcomes included depressive symptoms (HDRS, BDI), anxiety (HARS), glycaemic control (HbA1c, FPG, PPG), and BMI. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models; subgroup analysis by follow-up duration and sensitivity analysis were conducted. Results: Nine RCTs (770 participants) were included. Overall, SSRIs did not significantly improve HDRS (MD = 0.16, 95% CI -0.69 to 1.01, Conclusion: Preliminary evidence suggests that SSRIs may offer modest antidepressant benefits when used for ≥ 6 months in diabetic patients with depression, but they may be associated with a small increase in anxiety scores and do not appear to improve glycaemic control or BMI. However, the overall certainty of evidence is low to moderate. Monitoring of early anxiety symptoms is recommended, and further high-quality RCTs are needed. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261305439.

Indexed as

DepressionDiabetes MellitusSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitorsclinical efficacydepressiondiabetesselective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)system evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42558439
PMCPMC13437470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.