ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
From waste to nutrition: valorization strategies for surplus and ugly produce within the Food Use and Waste Hierarchy.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fruit and vegetables (F&Vs) account for approximately 50% of global food loss and waste (FLW). This represents an environmental and economic burden, as well as a significant, yet often overlooked concern for human nutrition. At the farm level, surplus (products for which there is no buyer) and "ugly produce" (products rejected for failing aesthetic standards) are often discarded or diverted for low value uses, such as composting or animal feed, despite retaining a good nutritional and functional quality. Current valorization frameworks, including the EU Food Use and Waste Hierarchy (FUWH), prioritize environmental and economic criteria, yet largely overlook an explicit nutrition-sensitive dimension. This review addresses this gap by proposing a nutrition-sensitive reinterpretation of the EU FUWH that is specifically applied to surplus and ugly F&Vs at the primary production level. The key advance over previous adaptations of the hierarchy is the incorporation of a tier aimed at "food-grade processing and nutritional valorization" above animal feed use. This new tier is based on the principle that retaining nutrients and bioactive compounds for human consumption is a higher-order outcome. The situation reveals a nutrition-sensitive paradox in which strategies with the highest nutritional preservation potential face the greatest implementation barriers, calling for policy, economic and logistical interventions that realign incentive structures with nutrition-sensitive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.