ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Resilience as recovery: stakeholder perspectives on Uganda's health system response to infectious disease shocks.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The conceptualization, definition, and measurement of health system resilience remain contested, hindering policy integration. Country-specific empirical evidence from sub-Saharan Africa, where infectious disease shocks recur, is limited. This study explored how national-level Ugandan stakeholders conceptualize health system resilience to infectious disease shocks and its attributes. Methods: We conducted a descriptive exploratory qualitative study using semi-structured key informant interviews with 15 purposively selected national-level stakeholders from the Ministry of Health, academia, and development and implementing partners between May and July 2025. Data were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive (abductive) thematic analysis approach, drawing on Kruk et al.'s and the WHO's resilience frameworks while remaining open to emergent themes. Reporting follows the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). Results: Participants conceptualized resilience across five capacities: preparedness, absorptive, adaptive, transformative, and recovery. Recovery-dominated narratives prevailed, while transformative capacity was least articulated, indicating a system oriented toward "bouncing back" rather than reform: A resilient system in Uganda is one that anticipates and prepares for infectious disease shocks; absorbs them while sustaining essential services; adapts through innovation and operational adjustment; recovers core functioning; and institutionalizes learning to transform structures, financing, and service delivery models in preparation for future shocks. Seven interconnected attributes were identified: (1) governance and leadership, (2) preparedness, (3) service delivery, (4) community involvement, (5) adaptability, (6) collaboration and partnerships, and (7) soft skills. Governance and leadership emerged as foundational; preparedness, service delivery, community involvement, adaptability, and collaboration as structural; and soft skills (trust, communication, cultural sensitivity) as relational enablers. Conclusions: From the perspective of national-level actors, Uganda's health system is predominantly reactive, with recovery prioritized over transformation. Strengthening resilience requires institutionalizing learning, anticipatory financing, empowered subnational structures, and multisectoral partnerships. Future research should triangulate these perspectives with subnational, frontline, and community voices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.