ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Evaluation of the effects of a high-efficiency decontamination solution for sodium contamination on sodium burn wounds in rat skin.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To prepare a compound irrigation formulation for sodium contamination and evaluate its effects on wound pH regulation and early repair outcomes in a rat model of sodium-induced skin injury. Methods: A compound irrigation formulation for sodium contamination was prepared using glycine and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt as the principal formulation components. Sixty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to five groups: no-irrigation group (NI), water irrigation group (WI), boric acid irrigation group (BA), Diphoterine irrigation group (DP), and decontamination solution group (DS), with 12 rats in each group. At 3 min after sodium contamination, wounds were treated with the corresponding interventions and irrigated for 15 min. Wound pH was monitored during irrigation, and wound healing was evaluated on day 14. Histopathological changes were assessed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and semi-quantitative injury scoring, and collagen deposition was evaluated by Masson staining. The expression of PCNA, VEGF, α-SMA, and CD31 was detected by immunohistochemistry, and the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α were measured by ELISA. Results: The DS group showed a rapid reduction in wound alkalinity, and wound pH shifted toward a near-neutral range after 15 min of irrigation. Compared with the NI, WI, and BA groups, the DS group had a significantly higher wound healing rate on day 14 (P < 0.05). Histological analysis and semi-quantitative injury scoring showed better tissue preservation, reduced inflammatory cell infiltration, a lower histopathological injury score, and increased collagen deposition in the DS group. PCNA expression did not differ significantly among groups, whereas the expression levels of the angiogenesis- and repair-associated markers VEGF, α-SMA, and CD31 were increased in the DS group compared with the NI and WI groups (P < 0.05). In addition, IL-1β and TNF-α levels were decreased in the DS group compared with the NI and WI groups (P < 0.05), IL-6 was decreased compared with the NI group (P < 0.05), and IL-10 was increased compared with all other groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The compound irrigation formulation rapidly reduced wound alkalinity and was associated with improved early repair outcomes, including increased collagen deposition, enhanced angiogenesis-related marker expression, and a more favorable local inflammatory profile in sodium-induced skin wounds in rats. These findings suggest its potential as an emergency irrigation formulation for sodium contamination, although direct sodium removal and the independent contribution of each component require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.