ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
UAV-based monitoring of fruit-manifested abiotic stress in crops under label scarcity: a case study of blossom-end rot in processing tomatoes.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Safeguarding the yield and quality of field crops against abiotic stresses is critical for large-scale agricultural production and precision agronomy. This study addresses the challenges of detecting concealed fruit stress and overcoming label scarcity in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) multispectral monitoring, using blossom-end rot (BER) in processing tomatoes as a case study. Methods: We developed a leaf-fruit synergistic Roll and Color Disease Index (RCDI), integrating fruit incidence with visible canopy phenotypic features to characterize the combined canopy-fruit stress status associated with BER. A three-level screening strategy was used to identify the optimal spectral feature set. A Multi-model Collaborative Cyclic Self-Training (MCC-ST) framework was subsequently developed to address the limited availability of severity-labeled samples. Results: The combination of GRVI, NDVI, and SAVI was identified as the optimal spectral feature set, achieving stable within-dataset binary classification performance of approximately 97% in repeated cross-validation. Under 30 random-seed repeated stratified three-fold cross-validations, MCC-ST + DT and MCC-ST + RF achieved RCDI-based BER severity-grading accuracies of 85.00% ± 0.31% and 85.07% ± 0.42%, respectively. Compared with the corresponding original DT and RF models, MCC-ST improved repeated-validation accuracy by 16.19-4.09 percentage points. Discussion: The RCDI helps bridge the observational gap between canopy signals and concealed fruit stress, while MCC-ST alleviates the bottleneck associated with label scarcity. The proposed approach provides a promising framework for crop abiotic-stress monitoring under limited-label conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.