ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Coagulation dysfunction as an independent predictor of early pregnancy loss in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a machine learning-based retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Current studies on adverse pregnancy outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have primarily focused on metabolic and endocrine abnormalities, whereas systematic investigations addressing live birth outcomes and coagulation dysfunction remain limited. In addition, there is a lack of comprehensive tools for early pregnancy risk stratification. This study aimed to explore the associations between early pregnancy indicators and early pregnancy loss (EPL) in women with PCOS, identify key risk factors, and subsequently develop a clinically interpretable predictive model to facilitate early risk identification and individualized management. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, 2,290 women with PCOS who achieved natural singleton pregnancies were included. Participants were randomly divided into a training set (n=1,832) and a validation set (n=458). Demographic, endocrine-metabolic, and coagulation parameters were collected. Independent predictors were identified by multivariable logistic regression. Predictive models were constructed using logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost algorithms, with model interpretability evaluated using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Furthermore, a temporally independent external cohort was introduced for external validation to assess the generalizability of the model. Results: Key predictors included D-dimer, fibrin degradation products (FDP), body mass index (BMI), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Elevated D-dimer and FDP levels were associated with increased EPL risk, suggesting enhanced coagulation activation and impaired microcirculation at the maternal-fetal interface. The XGBoost model showed the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.926 (95% CI: 0.902-0.950). The model also maintained stable discriminative ability in temporal external validation (AUC = 0.705), although a certain degree of calibration drift was observed. Conclusion: Coagulation abnormalities during early pregnancy are closely associated with the occurrence of EPL in women with PCOS and may serve as independent risk factors. Machine learning models integrating multidimensional clinical indicators can effectively enable early identification of high-risk populations. Temporal external validation further suggested a certain degree of model generalizability, although additional optimization and validation are still required. These findings may provide valuable support for risk stratification and intervention decision-making during early pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.