SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
The influence of olfactory stimuli on social cognition, prejudice and emotions: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review synthesizes research on how olfactory stimuli influence social cognition, emotions, and prejudice, an area that remains understudied despite the olfactory system's direct neural connections to limbic regions like the amygdala and hippocampus. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the authors systematically searched PubMed and Web of Science (2000-2025), identifying 21 eligible studies from 569 records. The literature reveals three core mechanisms through which odors exert their effects: (1) early perceptual modulation of social stimuli, (2) affective priming via disgust and valence systems, and (3) higher-order modulation of social judgments and moral evaluation. Unpleasant odors (e.g., sweat, rotten smells) increase vigilance, bias emotion perception, and amplify both implicit and explicit prejudices against marginalized groups such as gay men or immigrants. Putative human chemosignals like androstadienone and hedione subtly modulate mood, attention, and social judgments in context-dependent ways. Individual differences-including disgust sensitivity, neuroticism, and religiosity-systematically moderate these effects. Neuroimaging (EEG/fMRI) shows that odors engage distributed networks involving the amygdala, insula, and frontal regions, affecting early and late-stage emotional processing. The authors conclude that olfactory stimuli act as powerful, often subconscious modulators of social cognition. They propose that odors function as contextual priors that bias social inference, especially under conditions of ambiguity or uncertainty. These findings highlight the need to integrate olfactory dimensions into models of social behavior and bias formation. Future research should employ ecologically valid paradigms such as virtual reality to better understand how smells shape real-world interpersonal and intergroup dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.