SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Soldiers' resilience? A systematic review of micro-, meso-, and macro-level resilience factors in the military.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The military profession is highly challenging because soldiers are exposed to potentially traumatic stressors which cannot be avoided. Given that these stressors are associated with psychological health risks, the need for resilience has become crucial within the military. Although research has recognized the importance of a multilevel consideration of resilience in military populations, little research has been done on this so far. Hence, we aimed to systematically review individual (micro-level) and organizational (meso- and macro-level) resilience factors among active-duty soldiers. During our search, we identified nine studies for inclusion, of which two used qualitative and seven applied quantitative methods. We identified 82 resilience factors on all levels. Most studies focused on micro-level factors, such as adaptive coping or individual characteristics, whereas meso- (e.g., leadership behavior) and macro-level factors (e.g., structural conditions) remain underrepresented. Moreover, no included study investigated multilevel factors with nested data. We discuss these findings from a systemic perspective, shifting the responsibility for building a resilient environment from the individual to the organization. Thus, we highlight that resilience should be promoted through significant organizational practices that ensure access to resources, enhance a sense of belonging, and reduce stigma. Moreover, we recommend that military organizations first address structural conditions and cultural barriers to resilience. Our findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of how resilience can be developed across micro, meso, and macro levels within military organizations and offer new perspectives for sustainable resilience building in the military. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42021254629].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.