Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558293›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2026

Neuromuscular training for preventing ankle joint injuries in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hexuan Xiang, Kexiang Yang, Huiling Liao, Xiaolong Zhang, Yunong Zhang, Hyun-Chul Jeong

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hexuan XiangDepartment of Basic Education, Bijie Vocational and Technical College, Bijie, China.
Kexiang YangDepartment of Physical Education, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Huiling LiaoDepartment of Physical Education, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Xiaolong ZhangDepartment of Physical Education, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Yunong ZhangDepartment of Physical Education, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Chul JeongDepartment of Physical Education, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ankle joint injuries are among the most common sports-related injuries. However, determining the most effective training method to prevent these injuries remains a challenge. Neuromuscular training (NMT) is a preventive strategy aimed at reducing muscle and ligament injuries, yet its effectiveness in preventing ankle joint injuries is not fully understood, and robust clinical evidence is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to summarize the preventive effects of NMT on ankle joint injuries and provide an overview of effective exercise components. To investigate the impact of neuromuscular training on the incidence of ankle joint injuries, dynamic neuromuscular control, foot and ankle functionality, and postural stability in athletes. A comprehensive search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Embase databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the use of neuromuscular training for the prevention of primary and secondary ankle joint injuries in athletes. The search was limited to studies published up until July 31, 2024. Relevant references from the included studies were also reviewed to identify additional literature. Two independent reviewers performed the search, selection, and data extraction. The risk of bias was assessed independently using the Cochrane Handbook. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager5.3. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE methodology. A total of 13 randomized controlled trials, involving 1, 476 participants, were included in the final analysis. Compared to no training or conventional training, neuromuscular training was associated with a 55% reduction in the incidence of ankle joint injuries (RR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0. 25-0. 81, I²: 62%, P: 0.007). In terms of dynamic neuromuscular control, NMT significantly increased reach distances in the Star Excursion Balance Test, specifically in the posteromedial direction (MD: 5.02 cm, 95%CI: 2.22-7. 81, I²: 1%, P: 0.0004), posterolateral direction (MD: 3.05 cm, 95%CI: 0.74-5.35, I²: 0%, P: 0.01), and anterior direction (MD: 2.23 cm, 95%CI: 0.05-4.40, I²: 0%, P: 0.05). Additionally, NMT improved foot and ankle function in the sports domain, as evidenced by an increased score in the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM-Sports) (MD: 8.66, 95%CI: 5.10-12.21, I²: 0%, P: <0.00001). Descriptive analysis also suggested improvements in postural stability and ankle instability. However, there was no significant improvement in the foot and ankle function in the daily living domain (FAAM-ADL) (MD: 2.86, 95%CI: -2.20-7.92, I²: 80%, P: 0.27). This meta-analysis demonstrates that neuromuscular training significantly reduces the incidence of ankle joint injuries, enhances dynamic neuromuscular control, improves foot and ankle function in sports, and appears to positively influence postural stability and ankle instability. However, further high-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm the preventive effects of neuromuscular training on ankle joint injuries. No external funding was received for this study, and the authors declare no conflicts of interest. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024572932, identifier CRD42024572932.

Indexed as

ankle joint injuriesCumberland Ankle Instability Toolfoot and ankle ability measuremeta-analysisneuromuscular training

Identifiers

PMID42558293
PMCPMC13437404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.